From: john1@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)
Subject: Re: Confessions of Nat Turner
Date: 06 May 1998 00:00:00 GMT
Message-ID: <EsJs2A.KnE@world.std.com>
References: <354C60D2.4716@hotmail.com>
<6ioghn$4t8q$1@newssvr03-int.news.prodigy.com>
Organization: The World, Public Access Internet, Brookline, MA
Newsgroups: soc.culture.african.american,alt.christnet.bible,
soc.culture.jewish,soc.culture.israel,nyc.general,soc.motss,
alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.support.crossposting





In Message-ID: <6ioghn$4t8q$1@newssvr03-int.news.prodigy.com>
Newsgroups: soc.culture.african.american
Subject: Re: Confessions of Nat Turner
Date: Tue, 5 May 1998 22:03:34 -0400
"mr. mike" <mdeanw@prodigy.net> wrote:



> After reading that novel way back when in high school, I concluded that
> the author took poetic license to the max. Not in terms of the slave
> revolt, but in giving the motivations for Turner's actions (a
> predilection for white women and latent homosexual tendencies). Never
> trust entertainment mediums to give a truthful account of historical
> events.

Funny thing is I DO trust one entertainment medium to give a truthful account of historical events. I am referring to Howard Fast's novel: "My Glorious Brothers." This novel describes the revolt of the Maccabees of Israel against the homosexual oppression committed against Israel by the successors of Alexander of Macedonia (a.k.a. "Alexander the Great"). I refer to the Maccabees as My Glorious Ancestors.

I can never understand why the Ku Klux Klan insists that the Kink James version of the Christian Bible is the only legitimate version. Kink James the First of England, as is well known, was a homosexual. Now, I don't know anything about biblical scholarship. In place of biblical scholarship I use common sense. The Roman Catholic (Douay) version of the Christian Bible includes the books of the Maccabees in its version of the Old Testament. Common sense tells me that the books of the Maccabees were excluded from the Kink James version of the Christian Bible in order to conform to the pro-homosexual feelings of Kink James.

If you look at "The Oxford Annotated Bible with the Apocrypha, Revised Standard Version", New York, Oxford University Press, 1965. Turn to page 221, (The pagination is somewhat confusing. It goes up to page 1544 and then starts over again. I am referring to the second cycle of pages.) it sez: "The style of 1 Maccabees is plain and straightforward and the book is generally an excellent historical source...."

You will notice the messages in soc.culture.african.american vilifying me in the strongest possible terms. These messages are motivated by my denunciations of NAMBLA, an organization of homosexual child-molesters. In the view of most of the homosexuals who post messages on Usenet, if one is opposed to homosexual child-molesting, then one is a "homophobe."

I don't know how many people who read soc.culture.african.american remember certain events which occurred in 1978. Here is what happened. Bernard Gifford, a Black official in the New York City educational system decided to run for the office of United States Congressman. I have forgotten exactly what position he held. It was either Assistant Superintendent of Schools, Deputy Superintendent of Schools, or something like that. He was running in the Democratic Party Primary in a congressional district which included Brooklyn Heights. His opponent was Frederick Richmond. Richmond had recently been arrested for offering money to an underage Black boy for an act of homosexual sex. Richmond somehow managed to worm himself out of a criminal conviction.

Edward I. Koch, who was New York City's homosexual mayor at that time, and who had expressed himself in the strongest possible terms as opposed to heterosexual prostitution, endorsed Richmond for re-election to Congress.

Gifford made an issue of the fact that Richmond had offered this underage Black boy money for sex. For campaigning on this issue, Gifford was denounced as a "homophobe."

As the saying goes: "The more things change, the more they remain the same." THAT'S why I am getting all of this vilification. That's why the overwhelming majority of homosexuals who post messages on Usenet consider me to be, among other things: "A Hateful Subhuman."



john1@world.std.com (Fred Cherry)


return